How Is Christianity Different from Other Religions? (Genesis 22:7-8)

How Is Christianity Different from Other Religions? (Genesis 22:7-8)

All religions are not the same! How is Christianity different from other religions? Read or listen to this chapter of to A Father Offers His Son to learn what makes Christianity different from other religions.

A father offers his son audiobook cover

The text in this post is from A Father Offers His Son: The True and Greater Sacrifice Revealed Through Abraham and Isaac, and the audio is from the accompanying audiobook. I am praying God uses the book and audiobook to exalt Christ and strengthen people’s relationships with Him!

How Is Christianity Different from Other Religions?

Christianity is the opposite of other religions, and the main difference is contained in a few profound words Abraham spoke to his son, Isaac:

Isaac said, “Where is the lamb for a burnt offering?”
Abraham replied, “My son, God will provide for Himself the lamb for a burnt offering.”

Genesis 22:7-8

Abraham’s words seem absurd. God would provide a lamb for the sacrifice to Him? Religion is about what man does. That is what makes it worship—man brings something that will please; man offers something to appease. At the heart of other religions are individuals bringing sacrifices to the false gods they worship, but at the heart of Christianity is a God Who provides the sacrifice Himself. This does not just make Christianity different than other religions; it makes Christianity the opposite of other religions.

Christianity Is Different from Other Religions Because God Provided the Sacrifice

Propitiation is a wonderful word, but it lacks use in the English language and, unfortunately, is even removed from some Bible versions. Propitiation is a two-part act that involves 1. turning away the wrath of an offended individual and 2. being reconciled to the person as a result. Close synonyms are appeasing, expiating, placating, and satisfying.

In other religions, man accomplishes the propitiation through the sacrifice he provides, but in Christianity, God accomplished the propitiation through the Sacrifice He provided. His wrath was turned away from believers because it was poured out on His Son. We are reconciled to God because of what He did for us: “When we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son” (Romans 5:10a). Thus, the four times the New Testament uses the word propitiation it refers to what God did for man, and not what man does for God:

  • Romans 3:25— “[Jesus] Whom God set forth as a propitiation by His blood.”
  • Hebrews 2:17—“In all things He had to be made like His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people.”
  • 1 John 2:2—“He Himself is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the whole world.”
  • 1 John 4:10—“In this is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.”

Only God could provide a perfect sacrifice that would appease Him. Isaiah 53:11 says, “He shall see the labor of His soul, and be satisfied.” The “labor” refers to Jesus’ suffering on the cross, and it “satisfied” God.

In Hebrews 10:5, Jesus said, “Sacrifice and offering You did not desire, but a body You have prepared for Me.” God did not desire the sacrifices and offerings in the Old Testament, but Jesus’ perfect, sinless “body” could appease Him. As the lyrics of “In Christ Alone” state, “‘Til on that cross as Jesus died, the wrath of God was satisfied.”

To go a step further, not only did God provide the Sacrifice, He became the Sacrifice. If we made propitiation for our sins, it would be about us and what we did for God. We could proudly take credit for our salvation. With God accomplishing the propitiation from beginning to end—providing and becoming the sacrifice—it is about Him and what He has done for us. He receives the praise and honor.

The Tower of Babel—A Picture of False, Works-Based Religions

The Tower of Babel was the first organized rebellion against God:

Then they said to one another, “Come, let us make bricks and bake them thoroughly… Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower whose top is in the heavens; let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth.”

Genesis 11:3-4

In false religions, people reach up to God offering sacrifices that amount to nothing. They spend their lives piling one brick on top of another, but they do not get any closer to heaven than the people who constructed the Tower of Babel. Three times they said, “Let us,” and their pride and self-focus is revealed through their desire to “make a name for [themselves]” versus God:

But the Lord came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built. And the Lord said, “Indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing that they propose to do will be withheld from them. Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another’s speech.”

Genesis 11:5–7

This is a dramatic reversal! Man said, “Let us build [to] the heavens…” but then God said, “Let Us go down…” referring to all three Persons: God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit. The language of God “coming down” is a theme throughout the Old Testament:

  • God saw the wickedness of Sodom and Gomorrah and said, “I will go down now and see whether they have done altogether according to the outcry against it that has come to Me; and if not, I will know” (Genesis 18:21).
  • When Israel was in slavery in Egypt God said, “So I have come down to deliver them out of the hand of the Egyptians, and to bring them up from that land to a good and large land, to a land flowing with milk and honey” (Exodus 3:8).
  • The psalmist said, “He bowed the heavens also, and came down with darkness under His feet” (Psalm 18:9; see also Psalm 144:5).

Christianity Is Different from Other Religions Because God Came Down to Us

The description of God coming down is not as literal as it sounds. God did not leave heaven to see what was happening at the Tower of Babel, Sodom and Gomorrah, or when Israel was in Egypt as though He did not know. This language shows God’s interest and intervention in man’s affairs. This is another difference revealing why Christianity is the opposite of other religions. False gods are often aloof, stoic, and uninterested in man’s affairs. The God of the Bible is deeply concerned and involved.

Examples of God “coming down” take place soon after Israel was delivered from Egypt. He came down to Sinai:

  • Exodus 19:11—“And let them be ready for the third day. For on the third day the Lord will come down upon Mount Sinai in the sight of all the people.”
  • Exodus 19:18–20—“Now Mount Sinai was completely in smoke, because the Lord descended upon it in fire. Its smoke ascended like the smoke of a furnace, and the whole mountain quaked greatly. And when the blast of the trumpet sounded long and became louder and louder, Moses spoke, and God answered him by voice. Then the Lord came down upon Mount Sinai, on the top of the mountain.”

Then God came down to the Tent of Meeting, followed by the tabernacle (Exodus 40:34), and finally the temple (1 Kings 8:10):

And it came to pass, when Moses entered the tabernacle, that the pillar of cloud descended and stood at the door of the tabernacle, and the Lord talked with Moses. All the people saw the pillar of cloud standing at the tabernacle door, and all the people rose and worshiped, each man in his tent door. So the Lord spoke to Moses face to face, as a man speaks to his friend.

Exodus 33:9–11

Much of the language describes God as a man: “stood/standing at the door… talked with Moses.” We are even told God spoke to Moses “as a man.” This is anthropomorphism or ascribing human attributes to God. Other examples include God remembering (Genesis 8:1), smelling (Numbers 15:3), stretching out His hand (Psalm 136:12), making His face shine on us (Numbers 6:25), and opening His ears to our cries (Psalm 34:15). God does not literally forget and then need to remember, hold people’s hand, or open His ears (as though there are other times He does not hear us). Instead, this language is used to help us relate to God and understand Him better.

This prefigured the incarnation. Jesus not only fulfilled the prophecies of His coming; He also fulfilled the Old Testament anthropomorphic imagery of God being a man and coming down from heaven to earth. The apostle Paul explained it this way:

Though [Jesus] was in the form of God, He did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, by taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross.

Philippians 2:6–8

The Kenosis

It is not just that Jesus came from heaven to earth; it is how He came. The Greek word for “emptied Himself” is kenoō, which is where we get the theological term, kenosis. When God became a Man in the Person of Jesus Christ, He emptied Himself of certain rights and privileges:

  • Omniscience—Jesus limited Himself to knowing only what the Father wanted Him to know. For example, the “day and hour” of His return was not something for Him to know during His earthly ministry (Mark 13:32).
  • Eternal riches—Jesus’ life on earth did not have the glory or majesty He knew in heaven. On earth He owned very little: “Though He was rich, yet for your sakes He became poor, that you through His poverty might become rich” (2 Corinthians 8:9).
  • Honor—In heaven, He was loved and worshiped, but on earth, He was, “a reproach of men, and despised by the people” (Psalm 22:6; see also Isaiah 53:3). When “He came to His own… His own did not receive Him” (John 1:11).
  • Glory—He did not look on earth as He looked in heaven: “Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was” (John 17:5).

When discussing the kenosis, it is also important to understand what Jesus did not empty Himself of—deity. He did not stop being God. The words “taking the form” reveal an addition, not a subtraction. Jesus did not exchange deity for humanity. He added humanity to deity. He had two natures, human and divine, which are inseparable. He will forever be the God-Man. Not fifty-fifty, but 100 percent God and 100 percent man.

Jesus’ entrance into the world gives credibility and reveals why Christianity is the opposite of other religions. This is not the story man would write. This reveals another difference between Christianity and other religions. Would false gods be born in Bethlehem in a manger to a poor family with no-name parents? Is this how they would make their entrance into the world? Jesus “took the form of a servant.” Would false gods of other religions come and serve? They would be served. Would they stoop down and wash people’s feet? They would have people wash their feet. The Jews, who spent centuries looking forward to their Messiah, struggled with Jesus being the Christ because of His humility.

Paul used ever-increasing terms to describe Jesus as the Lamb that God would “provide for Himself”—Jesus “did not cling to equality with God… He emptied Himself… He became a Man… He was a Servant… He was obedient… even to death” (Philippians 2:6–8). But Paul did not stop at stating Jesus’ death because it is not just that He died. It is how He died—the most shameful, agonizing death imaginable—“even death on a cross.”

This is the bottom rung that God the Father needed His Son to reach for man to be saved; therefore, even at Jesus’ birth, the focus is on His death. Matthew and Luke provide the records, and they do not focus on the world receiving a great teacher, miracle worker, prophet, or even king. Jesus was all these, but the focus is on the world receiving a Savior:

  • Matthew 1:21—“And she will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name Jesus, for He will save His people from their sins.”
  • Luke 2:11—“For there is born to you this day in the city of David a Savior, Who is Christ the Lord.”

When people think of Jesus, if they fail to see Him as the fulfillment of Abraham’s words—the Lamb “God [provided] for Himself”—they fail to recognize why He came. They fail to see why Christianity is the opposite of other religions.

The Only Son God Recognizes

Three times (Genesis 22:2, 12, and 16), God said Isaac was Abraham’s “only son.” God wants to make sure we do not miss that Isaac was Abraham’s “only son,” but Abraham had another son—Ishmael. Why did God not acknowledge him? He was produced from unbelief instead of faith, and “whatever is not from faith is sin” (Romans 14:23). Ishmael was the result of Abraham and Sarah’s works to fulfill God’s promise, which God would not recognize. Ishmael is a picture of salvation by works—seeking to fulfill God’s promise through human effort. The spiritual application is that as Abraham could not work to receive God’s promised son, we cannot work to receive God’s promised salvation:

  • Romans 3:28 (ESV)—“A man is justified by faith apart from works of the law.”
  • Ephesians 2:8–9—“For by grace you have been saved through faith, and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast.”
  • 2 Timothy 1:9—“[God] saved us… not according to our works, but according to His own purpose and grace which was given to us in Christ Jesus before time began”
  • Titus 3:5—“Not by works of righteousness which we have done, but according to His mercy He saved us…”

God does not recognize our works for salvation any more than He recognized Ishmael. Aside from being ineffective, attempting to be saved by works also, produces one of two equally terrible outcomes. People say, “I can never be good enough,” which produces despair, or “I have been good enough,” which produces pride.

Ishmael illustrates working for salvation, and Galatians 4:30 quotes Genesis 21:10 to show he must be removed:

Nevertheless what does the Scripture say? “Cast out the bondwoman (Hagar) and her son (Ishmael), for the son of the bondwoman shall not be heir with the son (Isaac) of the freewoman (Sarah).”

Since Ishmael was not a legitimate son, he could not receive the inheritance. Only Isaac could:

  • Genesis 15:4—“The Lord [said to Abraham], ‘This one (Ishmael) shall not be your heir, but one who will come from your own body (Isaac) shall be your heir.’”
  • Genesis 21:10—“[Sarah] said to Abraham, ‘Cast out this bondwoman and her son; for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, namely with Isaac.’”

God recognized Isaac because he was the son of faith, and God recognizes us if we are sons of faith: “Therefore know that only those who are of faith are sons of Abraham… For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:7, 26).

In Genesis 26:3, God told Isaac, “Dwell in this land, and I will be with you and bless you; for to you and your descendants I give all these lands, and I will perform the oath which I swore to Abraham your father.” Isaac was the heir, so he received the inheritance. We are heirs with Christ, so we share in the inheritance:

  • Romans 8:17—“If children, then heirs—heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ.”
  • Galatians 3:29—“If you are Christ’s, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”

A Father offered His Son so people can become His sons and daughters. The work has been done. On the cross, Jesus said, “It is finished” (John 19:30). God raised Him from the dead on the third day.

Have you recognized you are a sinner who cannot save himself/herself, and your works are building the Tower of Babel? Please do not finish this book without repenting of your sins and putting your faith in the Lamb God provided. He was willing to receive the punishment your sins deserve, so you would not have to experience that punishment—eternity in hell—yourself.

“This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, of whom I am chief.”

1 Timothy 1:15

Questions to Answer in the Comments Section

  1. What is the main reason Christianity is the opposite of other religions?
  2. Why is it important that God, versus man, provided the sacrifice for mankind’s salvation?
  3. What is the motivating factor behind false religions?
  4. How are false gods different than the God of the Bible?
  5. What did Jesus “empty Himself” of at the incarnation?
  6. What did Jesus not “empty Himself” of at the incarnation?
  7. How does the contrasting account with Ishmael help us better understand God’s plan of redemption?
  8. If you have repented and put your faith in Christ, provide three verses that give you confidence in your salvation.
  9. Do you often think about what you need to do for God, or do you think about what God has done for you?
  10. When you think about what God has done for you, in what ways should that affect your life?
  11. Can you think of other reasons Christianity is the opposite of other religions?

If you have not repented and put your faith in Christ, what is hindering you? Are you confused or afraid? Do you have questions? If I can help you, please contact me.

20 Responses

  1. Thank you for this teaching sir.
    I believe in the old testament God didn’t forgive sins only due to sacrifices offered. He looked at the sincerity of the heart. No sacrifices where very important
    If that be the case why then send Jesus to die again on the cross for the sins of the world if He(God) already forgave sins of persons who where sincere as David without any form of sacrifice?

    If He forgave then why can’t He forgive now without Jesus?
    Does it mean God changed? From forgiving sins without the must need for blood to the must need of blood?

    I mean I don’t see any coherence if that be the case

    1. Danielle,
      I completely agree with you that God did not forgive sins in the Old Testament due to sacrifices offered. Except for Christ’s sacrifice, which did not take place in the Old Testament, no sacrifice throughout human history has ever taken away even one sin. Hebrews 10:4 says it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins.

      I’m not sure I completely understand what you are saying, but if you are saying that it would be unnecessary to send Jesus to die for our sins if animal sacrifices could take away sins, then I agree with you.

      People in the Old Testament were looking forward in faith to Christ’s sacrifice like we look back on it in faith. They were not forgiven without Christ’s sacrifice. It is incorrect to say God forgave people in the Old Testament without Christ’s sacrifice. If God did forgive people in the Old Testament without Christ’s sacrifice, then yes, he would be able to do the same in the New Testament.

      Would you do me a favor and read this post I wrote about how salvation and forgiveness taking place in the Old Testament?

  2. To be honest, Hinduism is the FIRST religion that mentioned God taking form and sacrificing himself. Vishnu offered his blood as a sacrifice for man’s sins in the Kurma Purana, long before Jesus was even born.

    The only effort we put in is NOT to get into heaven, but to curtail our suffering on this plane. Regardless if you believe in Jesus or not stress, anxiety, depression, disease, poverty etc… still affects you. Spiritual cultivation is to destroy suffering.

    1. Hi Adam,
      Thanks for reading and commenting. I confess my understanding of Hinduism is fairly limited, but correct me if I’m wrong. Isn’t salvation (or moksha) attained when Hindus break free from the cycle of reincarnation and become one with what they believe to be God? And this takes place by eliminating the bad karma from your life? To me, this is works-based, which is the opposite of Christianity: salvation by grace through faith, not by works (Ephesians 2:8). In that sense Christianity would stand opposed to Hinduism, right? Hindus are attempt to remove karma by sacrificial devotion and service, mastering your actions to please your god, and through knowledge of the creation. Seems very work-based to me unless I’m missing something.

  3. When you really think about how different Christianity is, it should guide your entire life. I must admit, that having been in church all my life, I tend to take it for granted and should think about it more. I have enjoyed a deeper look at Jesus’ sacrifice this Easter season.

    1. Hi Tara,
      Yes, you’re right—thinking about what Christ has done for us should affect the way we live. We’re not saved by works, but works are the evidence that we are saved, or they’re the evidence that we’re thankful to Christ for what He’s done for us.

  4. Hey Scott, what a great reminder that following Jesus is about what he did for me, not what I can do for him. Although I ‘know’ this, as a driven person I frequently find myself trying to find value in how much I get done throughout the day.

    To answer your 2nd discussion question, I’d like to get to the end of my day and start framing it in terms of how God views me in Christ. Not what I’ve done or not done. That would, ironically, take the pressure off and allow me to more honestly assess how it really went.

    Thanks again!

    1. Hi Bryan,
      Yes, we “know” it, but we need to be reminded. I was reminded while reading and writing my own post! I think this is one of the reasons the Word is so repetitive. Some things we need to hear again and again. What Jesus did for us being one of the most important!

      Thanks for your thoughts Brother!

  5. Martin Luther (1483-1546). While studying law, Luther, fearing death in a thunderstorm, promised God he would become a monk if God spared him. As a monk and professor of Bible at the University of Wittenberg, Luther attempted to secure his salvation by adhering to a very strict code of ethics, obedience to the monastic order, and ceaseless confession. This proved unsatisfactory and Luther continued to have intense emotional struggles with his own salvation until an epiphany struck him in the tower of his Augustinian monastery. It was during this “tower experience” that Luther realized that salvation was a free gift imputed to man through Christ’s righteousness. We are justified by the grace of God through the atoning death of Jesus on the cross. Our good works, then, do not cause our salvation, but rather they are a result of our salvation. God does not love us because we are good—we are good because God loves us. With this new understanding of salvation, Luther went on to criticize the Catholic Church for, among other things, selling indulgences to people with the promise that these purchases would help assure their salvation. Luther protested this and other things in his famous Ninety-five Theses. This eventually led to a major conflict between Luther and his German supporters and the Catholic Church in Rome. The end result was the Protestant Reformation, although Luther saw himself not as the creator of a new church, but as a reformer of the Catholic Church, leading her back to the Pauline doctrine of justification by faith alone.

    1. This is great, thanks Steve. I’m familiar with this testimony, and I heard – whether it’s true or not – that the specific verse Luther heard going through his mind was, “The just shall live by faith.” Praise God for the work He’s done.

Do you have a question or thought? If so, please let me know. I do my best to respond to each comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Scott's Podcast
Subscribe to Scott's Newsletter

… and receive a free ebook. 
You can unsubscribe anytime.

Newsletter subscription for Scott LaPierre with Seven Biblical Insights