Share

What Does the Bible Say About Divorce and Remarriage? (Luke 16:18 and Matthew 5:31-32)

What Does the Bible Say About Divorce and Remarriage? (Luke 16:18 and Matthew 5:31-32)

What does the Bible say about divorce and remarriage? Can people divorce? What are the conditions for people to remarry? Why did Jesus repeatedly associate divorce and remarriage with adultery? How can we harmonize Matthew 5:31-32 with Mark 10:11-12 and Luke 16:18? Read this post or listen to the accompanying sermon for answers.

Your Marriage God's Way book and workbook by Scott LaPierre

By my calculations, I have preached about 550 sermons at Woodland Christian Church. I can honestly say that the sermon on divorce and remarriage was the first I ever dreaded preaching. I knew that it was coming, and I vainly hoped that there would be some way to avoid it, but I don’t want to shrink back from faithfully teaching the whole counsel of God’s Word.

A Few Qualifications Before Discussing Divorce and Remarriage

  1. First, it is important that you understand what my heart is and is not on this topic. My heart is not to condemn people who are divorced and remarried or married to divorced people. Instead, my desire to is to condemn divorce itself.
    The divorce rate among evangelical Christians is 26%, compared to 33% for the rest of the population. I want to discourage divorce and see these numbers go down. If you are single, you should pay special attention, because if more people got married knowing what God’s Word says about divorce and remarriage, we would see less divorces.
    Recently I received two messages from people I don’t know who wanted to divorce their spouse. One email was from a woman who claimed to be abused by her husband, and the other email was from a man who claimed to be abused by his wife. I also received two comments on my blog: one from a man who wanted to divorce his wife and another from a woman who wanted to divorce her husband. I would like to think that if these people knew what God’s Word says about divorce and remarriage, they would not be thinking about divorcing their spouse.
  2. Second, please know that I do not think I am any better than anyone who is divorced or has married a divorced person. If I married one of the girls I dated, or I became a Christian after I was married, I’m sure I easily could have been divorced.
  3. Third, if you wonder how people who are divorced or married to divorced people feel about this topic, I can tell you that many of the people I have spoken with who have been divorced will be the first to tell you that they wish the church preached on divorce more often and more boldly.
  4. Fourth, I’m sharing a view that I did not hold at the beginning of my Christian life. The church I was saved in and then the church I started ministry in, held a different view. I came to this view after studying the scriptures for myself and deciding that I wanted to believe what the Bible said, versus what I had been taught.
  5. Fifth, you probably know that if you want to believe or disagree with something, you will not have any trouble finding support for your position by simply searching the Internet. Making this even more difficult, I know that some of the people who disagree with me are not ungodly people who support homosexuality or abortion. They are godly people whom I greatly respect.
    But the standard has never been what people think. The standard is what God’s Word says. So, as we begin, I would like to ask you to do your best to embrace God’s Word says even if it disagrees with something you have previously heard, believed, or could find on the Internet.

Believers Should not Divorce Unbelievers

1 Corinthians 7:10 To the married I give this charge (not I, but the Lord [Paul said this because Jesus talked about this as we’ll see]): the wife should not separate from her husband 11 (but if she does, she should remain unmarried or else be reconciled to her husband), and the husband should not divorce his wife.

This verse discusses separation. I said I received two emails this week from people claiming to be abused by their spouse. Responding to emails like this is always difficult, because Scripture says we are not supposed to come to a conclusion on a matter without hearing the other side.1 I told both people that there can be situations warranting separation. To be clear, the elders and I don’t think people should remain in abusive situations. 1 Corinthians 7:10 even says a wife should not separate from her husband, but then discusses the conditions if she chooses to do so. This shows separation is discouraged, but permissible.2 But divorce itself is not permissible. God says if people separate, they should remain unmarried or reconcile. Please keep this in mind.

Let me share part of a response from one of the woman after I told her that even if she separated from her husband, she could not divorce him: “Thank you for your reply. I will consider this carefully. He isn’t a Christian, and so I might go through the divorce because he has symptoms of being disordered.” I don’t know what she meant about him being disordered. I’m guessing all of us are disordered to some extent. She said she thought she could divorce him because he is not a Christian. If she does, she will disobey Scripture, because believers are commanded to remain married to unbelieving spouses:

1 Corinthians 7:12 To the rest I say (I, not the Lord [Paul said this because Jesus never talked about this): that if any brother (this means a man who is a believer) has a wife who is an unbeliever, and she consents to live with him, he should not divorce her. 13 If any woman has a husband who is an unbeliever, and he consents to live with her, she should not divorce him. 14 For the unbelieving husband is made holy because of his wife, and the unbelieving wife is made holy because of her husband. Otherwise your children would be unclean, but as it is, they are holy. 15 But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace.16 For how do you know, wife, whether you will save your husband? Or how do you know, husband, whether you will save your wife?

These verses are perfectly clear that believers must remain with unbelieving spouses.

What “Made Holy” Does and Does Not Mean

The part about being “made holy” by a spouse has caused lots of confusion, but it shouldn’t if we understand what holy does and doesn’t mean. Holy does not mean saved. Inanimate or nonliving objects can be holy, yet they can’t be saved. Instead, holy means set apart. Unbelievers who are married to believers are set apart for a special work.

We know that one of the best ways for unbelievers to come to salvation is through relationships with believers. And unbelievers could not have a more intimate relationship with a believer than through marriage. A believer staying in the marriage can provide the influence necessary to bring an unbelieving spouse to faith as 1 Corinthians 7:16 says. Again, this doesn’t mean that a husband could save his wife, or a wife could save her husband, but it does mean that as the unbelieving spouse is exposed to the believing spouse’s faith it can lead to the unbelieving spouse’s salvation.3

How tragic is it when believers divorce an unbeliever when that believer might be the unbeliever’s greatest chance to come to Christ? I have heard Christians talk about wanting a divorce because of how terrible their unbelieving spouse is. In my mind I think, “If your spouse is half as bad as you’re saying, he or she obviously needs Christ. And that person needs to be exposed to Christ through you!”

What “Not Bound” Does and Does Not Mean

The other matter Paul addressed was that of an unbelieving spouse separating from a believing spouse (1 Corinthians 7:15). While believers are instructed to stay in the marriage and be an influence to win the unbelieving spouse, they can’t force the unbelieving spouse to remain. If the unbelieving spouse separates, God says the believer is “not enslaved.” NKJV and NASB say, “not under bondage.” NIV says, “not bound.”

This is one of the most quoted verses to support divorce. People will say, “My spouse separated from me, so I am no longer bound to them and am free to remarry.” But that is not what the verse is saying. The context is separation. The phrase “not bound,” does not mean free to remarry, but it does mean “not bound” to make the unbelieving spouse stay.

God gives the reason for this: “God has called you to peace.”4 Fighting with a spouse to get them to stay is opposed to God’s call on our lives as Christians to be at peace. The believing spouse is “free” to let the person depart so the conflict ends. Plus, people are not won to Christ through heated arguments, force, and conflict.

If you have made reasonable efforts to remain with your spouse, but they leave, you can’t stop them. It’s almost like Romans 12:18, which says, “If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.” If we changed this to apply to marriage it could read, “If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with your unbelieving spouse, but if they are determined to leave, you are not bound to make them stay.” But it doesn’t mean you’re not bound to the person in marriage any longer.

We know this because of what Paul just said in 1 Corinthians 7:10-11. If the unbelieving spouse departs, the believing spouse should remain unmarried or reconcile. God is not going to contradict himself by saying this in 1 Corinthians 7:10-11 and then say the opposite in 1 Corinthians 7:15. He isn’t going to say, “If your spouse departs you should remain unmarried or be reconciled” and then say, “If your spouse departs you are no longer bound to that person and can remarry.” Even if an unbelieving spouse departs from a believing spouse, the believing spouse may still have a gospel influence on the unbelieving spouse by remaining faithful.

Remarriage Is Permissible If a Spouse Dies

1 Corinthians 7:39 A wife is bound to her husband as long as he lives. But if her husband dies, she is free to be married to whom she wishes, only in the Lord. 

This makes the same point that spouses are bound to each other as long as they live, and then identifies when a person is free to remarry (if the spouse dies) as long as the person is “in the Lord,” or is a believer. And this is not the only place in Scripture making this point:

Romans 7:2 For a married woman is bound by law to her husband while he lives, but if her husband dies she is released from the law of marriage. 3 Accordingly, she will be called an adulteress if she lives with another man while her husband is alive. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law, and if she marries another man she is not an adulteress.

God is always repetitive for a reason, and two times (in 1 Corinthians 7:2-3) He says that remarriage can take place when a spouse dies. This is the same thing God said in 1 Corinthians 7.

The Importance of Vows

In the Bible, a vow is a promise made to God. The seriousness of vows is repeatedly emphasized in scripture. When we make vows, we are entering a debtor’s relationship. The debt continues until the vow is paid. This is why Scripture talks about paying our vows:

  • Psalm 50:14 Pay your vows to the Most High.
  • Psalm 116:14 I will pay my vows to the Lord
  • Ecclesiastes 5:4 When you make a vow to God, do not delay to pay it; For He has no pleasure in fools. Pay what you have vowed
  • Jonah 2:9 I will pay what I have vowed.5

Whatever the motive behind a vow, God holds us to it. Numbers 30:2 says, “If a man vows a vow to the Lord, or swears an oath to bind himself by a pledge, he shall not break his word. He shall do according to all that proceeds out of his mouth.” We are told to keep our vows even to our own detriment. Psalm 15:4 says, “[God] honors those who…swears to his own hurt and does not change.” All of this should sober us to the idea of making vows to God and then not keeping them.

Hopefully you see what this has to do with marriage. Whenever I officiate weddings, before the vows are made, I remind the bride and groom that they are making these vows to each other, but more importantly to God Himself. We covenant with God to keep our vows “…till death do us part.” In the vows themselves we promise that only death will dissolve the marriage. Vows aren’t conditional on the other person keeping them. We are not alleviated of our vow simply because our spouse is unfaithful.

Remarriage with a Living Spouse Is Adultery

Luke 16:18 “Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery.

Jesus makes two points with this verse. First, a man who divorces his wife and marries someone else commits adultery. Second, if a man is not divorced but he marries a woman who is divorced he commits adultery.

Mark 10:11 And he said to them, “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her, 12 and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery.”

This is similar to Luke 16:18. Again, Jesus says that if a man divorces his wife and marries someone else he commits adultery, and He adds something for wives: if a wife divorces her husband and marries someone else she also commits adultery.

Recognize the verses in Luke, Mark, Romans, and 1 Corinthians all harmonize. There are no difficulties or inconsistencies with any of them. They all fit together perfectly to make the same three points:

  1. If you marry someone while you have a living spouse you commit adultery
  2. If you marry someone who has a living spouse you commit adultery
  3. If your spouse dies you are free to remarry

Matthew’s Gospel and Jewish Betrothals

Matthew is the gospel written to Jews, just like Luke (the only Gentile author of Scripture), wrote to Gentiles. Matthew repeatedly refers to Christ as the Son of David showing His Jewish ancestry. All Matthew’s major themes focus on the Jews’ messianic expectations, which is why Matthew quotes the Old Testament more than any other gospel writer. Gospel writers refer to the Kingdom of God, but Jews would be offended by the word God being written, so Matthew says kingdom of heaven 32 times even though it occurs nowhere else in Scripture.

Because Matthew was written to Jews, it cites Jewish customs without explaining them, in contrast to the other Gospels, which explain Jewish customs. For example:

  • Mark 7:3 says, “The Pharisees and all the Jews do not eat unless they wash their hands properly, holding to the tradition of the elders.” When Mark talks about the Jews washing their hands, he says they do it out of tradition.
  • John 19:40 says, “They took the body of Jesus and bound it in linen cloths with the spices, as is the burial custom of the Jews.” When John talks about Jesus’s body being bound with cloths and spices, he says it is their custom.

But Matthew talks about Jewish customs without any explanation.

Joseph Attempting to Divorce Mary

Joseph and Mary’s betrothal and divorce must be understood if Matthew’s words on divorce are to be understood:

Matthew 1:18 Now the birth of Jesus Christ took place in this way. When his mother Mary had been betrothed to Joseph, before they came together she was found to be with child from the Holy Spirit. 19 And her husband Joseph, being a just man and unwilling to put her to shame, resolved to divorce her quietly.

Joseph and Mary are betrothed, which means they are not yet married. Joseph finds out Mary is pregnant and knows the baby is not his, so he was going to divorce Mary even though they weren’t married. This would not seem strange to Matthew’s Jewish readers. It seems strange to us because we commonly associate betrothal with our engagements, which we shouldn’t. A betrothal was almost as binding as our marriages. Betrothed couples were regarded as husband and wife even before the wedding. Notice Joseph was called “her husband,” even though they weren’t married yet. Stoning was the punishment under the law if there was unfaithfulness during the betrothal period (Deuteronomy 22:23-24). Most importantly: betrothals were so serious a divorce was needed to terminate them:

Matthew 5:31 “It was also said, ‘Whoever divorces his wife, let him give her a certificate of divorce.’ 32 But I say to you that everyone who divorces his wife, except on the ground of sexual immorality, makes her commit adultery, and whoever marries a divorced woman commits adultery.6

Four Reasons Jesus Only Permitted Divorce During Betrothals

Jesus never permitted divorce when two people are married. Instead, for these four reasons I am convinced He only permitted a divorce during the betrothal period:

  1. We the example of a divorce with Joseph and Mary during the betrothal period.
  2. No other Gospels or epistles support divorce when two people are married.
  3. We want the Bible to interpret the Bible, and this is the only interpretation that harmonizes Matthew’s divorce verses with the verses in Mark, Luke, Romans and 1 Corinthians. If Jesus permitted divorce in Matthew when two people are married, He would contradict His own words in Mark and Luke and with Paul’s words in Romans and 1 Corinthians.
  4. Jesus used the word adultery in Mark 10:11 and Luke 16:18, because He was talking about unfaithfulness in marriage. But in Matthew 5:31-32 when Jesus talks about unfaithfulness, He uses the words sexual immorality, because He is not talking about married people. He is talking about people who are betrothed. If Jesus was talking about married people, He would have used the word adultery instead.7

Matthew 5:32 is almost identical to Luke 16:18 and Mark 10:11. In fact, if you take out the phrase, “except on the ground of sexual immorality,” it reads almost identically to Mark and Luke.

Why did Jesus add that here, but not in the other Gospels? Again, because He is talking to a Jewish audience that engaged in betrothals and He was letting them know how a betrothal could be broken off, like Joseph was going to do with Mary. If a betrothal was broken off for any reason other than sexual immorality, the couple were still considered betrothed and their future relationships would result in adultery.

Two Passages Encourage Remaining Married to Your Current Spouse Even If You Have Another Living Spouse

Understandably, one of the questions you probably have is, “What should people do if they remarried with a living spouse, or married someone with a living spouse?” Two passages can help answer this:

John 4:16 Jesus said to her, “Go, call your husband, and come here.” 17 The woman answered him, “I have no husband.” Jesus said to her, “You are right in saying, ‘I have no husband’; 18 for you have had five husbands, and the one you now have is not your husband. What you have said is true.”

The context is Jesus is speaking to the woman at the well. Two things to notice about Jesus’s words to the woman at the well.

  1. He seemed to recognize each of her subsequent husbands as husbands versus adulterous relationships. In other words, He said, “You have had five husbands,” versus, “You have had one husband and multiple adulterous relationships.”
  2. He even recognized that the man she was presently living with was not her husband. In other words, just because she was living with a man did not make him her husband.

Deuteronomy 24:1 “When a man takes a wife and marries her, if then she finds no favor in his eyes because he has found some indecency in her, and he writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, and she departs out of his house, 2 and if she goes and becomes another man’s wife, 3 and the latter man (the second husband) hates her and writes her a certificate of divorce and puts it in her hand and sends her out of his house, or if the latter man dies, who took her to be his wife, 4 then her former husband (the first husband), who sent her away, may not take her again to be his wife, after she has been defiled, for that is an abomination before the Lord. And you shall not bring sin upon the land that the Lord your God is giving you for an inheritance.

A man divorces a woman and she marries someone else. Notice the phrase “becomes another man’s wife” in Deuteronomy 24:2. This is similar to John 4 in that God seems to recognize the second husband as a husband, versus only being an adulterous relationship.

Then, the marriage to the second marriage ends through divorce or death. If the first marriage was still in existence and the second marriage was an adulterous relationship, then the woman should go back to her first husband. But instead that is exactly what is forbidden and called “an abomination.”

I assume God made this prohibition, because He foresaw people using divorce and remarriage to practice legally sanctioned adultery: marry someone, divorce that person, marry someone else, divorce that person and then go back to the first spouse.

Two Marriage Encouragements

Encouragement One: Church involvement is a major factor lowering divorce rates

Christians who attend church regularly have much lower divorce rates. Professor Bradley Wright, a sociologist at the University of Connecticut, provided these statistics: People who identify as Christians but rarely attend church have a 60% higher divorce rate, but people who identify as Christians and attend church regularly only have a 38% higher divorce rate.8Professor Scott Stanley from the University of Denver, who worked with leading sociologists on the Oklahoma Marriage Study, found something similar:

“Whether young or old, male or female, low-income or not, those who said that they were more religious reported higher average levels of commitment to their partners, higher levels of marital satisfaction, less thinking and talking about divorce and lower levels of negative interaction. These [statistics are true regardless of such] variables as income, education, and age [when married].”9

What do I think is behind these statistics? Church attendance provides accountability, fellowship, Bible teaching, prayer, worship, examples in other couples—all things that help strengthen marriages.

W. Bradford Wilcox, a leading sociologist at the University of Virginia and director of the National Marriage Project, found these statistics: People who identify as Christians and regularly attend church are 35% less likely to divorce than those who don’t attend church, but people who identify as Christians and rarely attend church are 20% MORE likely to divorce than people who don’t identify as Christians and don’t attend church at all.10 Why would the divorce rate be higher among people who call themselves Christians but rarely attend church, versus people who don’t attend church at all? Church and marriage are both areas of life involving commitment. To be a person of poor commitment in one area would probably mean lacking commitment in other areas as well.

Encouragement Two: Let Christ’s faithfulness to you fuel your faithfulness to your spouse

I understand that this teaching might be new to many of you. If you divorced your spouse and remarried someone else, or married someone with a living spouse, you might have done so in ignorance. But when we learn we have sinned, even in ignorance, the proper response is confession. Confess that you sinned in divorcing your spouse or in marrying someone with a living spouse, and be thankful for the forgiveness offered through Christ: “If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness” (1 John 1:9). Then, do your best in your current marriage to honor the Lord.

I also understand this is difficult to read if you are divorced and single, or find yourself in a difficult marriage. I am sorry. You’re probably saying, “You want me to remain single for the rest of my life or be reconciled to my spouse?” or “You want me to remain married to this difficult person?”

First, it’s not an issue of what I want. I believe that’s what God wants. Second, I understand a life of singleness can be difficult, but that doesn’t mean it’s wrong. Difficult is something everyone experiences in one form or another because we live in a fallen world and suffering is part of it. For some people the cross they must bear is a cancer diagnosis, loss of a child, miserable job, regular depression or anxiety, or remaining single if they have a living spouse. For others, the cross they have to bear, which is one that greatly honors the Lord, is remaining faithful to an unfaithful spouse. The main concern for all of us should be, “How can we honor the Lord with the cross we’re given?”

The greatest encouragement I can give regarding being faithful to a spouse is thinking about Christ’s faithfulness to us. Keep your eyes on Christ when there are times you don’t want to treat your spouse the way God commands. If you’re a husband, there are times you don’t want to love and cherish your wife like Christ does the church. If you’re a wife there are times you don’t want to submit your husband and respect him like the church is to do to Christ. At those times, you can’t think about your spouse, because you are upset with him or her. Thinking about your spouse only makes the situation worse. Instead, you must draw on another relationship, and that is your relationship with Christ. Don’t think about what your spouse has done to you. Think about what Christ has done for you. Don’t think about your spouse’s unfaithfulness. Think about Christ’s faithfulness:

Romans 8:38 I am sure that neither death nor life, nor angels nor rulers, nor things present nor things to come, nor powers, 39 nor height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ Jesus our Lord.

I would never try to convince a husband that his wife is worthy of his love, or try to convince a wife that her husband is worthy of her submission. The fact is, no spouse is worthy. But Christ is worthy of a husband’s love and a wife’s submission. Let His perfect faithfulness to us fuel our faithfulness in our marriages.

I know this is challenging to read. If you have any questions, or I can pray for you in any way, please comment below or write me through my contact page.

Footnotes

  1. Proverbs 18:13 says, “If one gives an answer before he hears, it is his folly and shame” and Proverbs 18:17 says, “The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.”
  2. For example, think about a wife who is being abused by her husband. She should reach out to the elders of the church for support. This does three things. First, It allows the elders to find a safe place for the wife and possibly her children. Second, it allows the elders to contact the authorities if needed if the wife hasn’t already. Third, it allows the elders to counsel the husband and share the gospel with him, because it is hard to believe that a husband abusing his wife is a Christian.
  3. Likewise, the children in that family are far more likely to be exposed to the gospel when the believing spouse remains in the home and creates a Christian environment. The alternative breaks up the home, possibly leaving the children in the custody of the unbelieving parent.
  4. This is especially pertinent when a wife or husband comes to Christ after getting married—an unbelieving spouse may end up rejecting a spouse who becomes a Christian. If the conversion of one spouse to Christianity has become the source of continued conflict, then the believing spouse should not quarrel over the unbelieving spouse’s departure. This would be antithetical to the Christian’s calling to peace. In addition, unbelievers are never won to Christ through heated arguments. It is more important to be true to the Christian testimony of peace than to attempt to keep an unbeliever in a marriage by force or argumentation. This elevates the Christian faith above even an unstable marriage. It’s better to let the unbeliever depart than to sully Christ’s reputation.
  5. See also Psalm 66:13 which says, “I will pay You my vows,” and Proverbs 20:25 which says, “It is a snare to say rashly, ‘It is holy,’ and to reflect only after making vows.”
  6. See also Matthew 19:3 And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking, “Is it lawful to divorce one’s wife for any cause?” 4 He answered, “Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, 5 and said, ‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? 6 So they are no longer two but one flesh. What therefore God has joined together, let not man separate.” 7 They said to him, “Why then did Moses command one to give a certificate of divorce and to send her away?” 8 He said to them, “Because of your hardness of heart Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. 9 And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.” 10 The disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.”
  7. If adultery was grounds for divorce and remarriage, then most everyone would have grounds for divorce based on Matthew 5:28, which says, “I say to you that everyone who looks at a woman with lustful intent has already committed adultery with her in his heart.”
  8. Bradley R.E. Wright, Christians Are Hate-Filled Hypocrites …and Other Lies You’ve Been Told, (Minneapolis, MN: Bethany House, 2010), p. 133.
  9. C.A. Johnson, S. M. Stanley, N.D. Glenn, P.A. Amato, S.L. Nock, H.J. Markman and M.R. Dion, Marriage in Oklahoma: 2001 Baseline Statewide Survey on Marriage and Divorce (Oklahoma City, OK: Oklahoma Department of Human Services 2002) p. 25, 26.
  10. W. Bradford Wilcox and Elizabeth Williamson, “The Cultural Contradictions of Mainline Family Ideology and Practice,” in American Religions and the Family, edited by Don S. Browning and David A. Clairmont (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007) p. 50.

20 Responses

  1. My thoughts: The top theologians are split on this issue as well as many churches.

    I know a relative who came home from work and found his wife with another man. She later cheated on the other guy as well. He divorced her and is remarried. I listened to a lady on Christian radio whose husband left her and their children. I think he committed adultery, too. He had no desire to stay with her. She eventually remarried and is serving God.
    Are you saying all these individuals are guilty of adultery and going to hell? Wouldn’t God speak and convict them if they are about to do something against his will?

    * God has convicted me on drinking alcohol (beer, wine, etc.). If I see a fellow brother or sister buying wine, I would probably think he/she is sinning. I’m not sure if I would tell the person he or she is going to hell unless I see a drinking problem. Ephesians 5:18 and 1Corin 10:21

    Matt 19:9 and Matt 5:32; You say this only applies to the Jewish betrothal period. Others say Matt was written to a Jewish audience. So, are Gentiles not to follow the Matt scriptures? We were drafted in: Romans 11:19 and Romans 1:16

    When someone has a relationship with your spouse, something happens physically, emotionally and spiritually.

    Proverbs 6:32 He who commits adultery lacks sense;
    he who does it destroys himself.
    33 He will get wounds and dishonor,
    and his disgrace will not be wiped away.
    34 For jealousy makes a man furious,
    and he will not spare when he takes revenge.
    35 He will accept no compensation;
    he will refuse though you multiply gifts.

    1 Corinthians 6:16 A man sleeps with a whore the two will become one flesh. Soul ties?

    God Bless!

    1. Hello Said,
      I know there are many theologians who disagree with my view, including many that I greatly respect.
      I am saying that people who remarried with a living spouse did commit adultery, but I’m not saying that they are going to hell for their sin any more than I am saying that anyone who has committed any sin is going to hell. In other words, all of us have sinned and are on our way to hell. Whether those people committed adultery, or whether all of us have committed adultery, we have all committed some sins and are deserving of hell. We are saved by faith in Christ. We must all repent and believe whether we have remarried with a living spouse or committed some other sin.

      Yes, something happens when married people commit adultery. It is a grievous sin. I am not denying it. But when we marry we commit to spend our lives with that person. I feel like to write much more would simply be repeating what I said in the sermon and the post.

  2. Hi Scott,
    My question to you is why do you suppose that such a tiny minority of Evangelical Protestants hold this view? I generally agree with what you have outlined, but so many Protestant churches that claim to be sola scriptura, many calling themselves “Bible Churches”, go out of their way to explain why remarriage is okay in spite of what the Bible says, and enforcement of any restriction on remarriage after divorce is almost non-existent. Are they simply scared of the pastoral implications of a faithful interpretation of scripture? Thoughts? I ask because so many of these pastors and clergy seem like otherwise faithful leaders, but on this topic they run away from what seems to be the most faithful reading of scripture. It also makes it hard for those of us who would like to counsel Christian friends whose marriages are failing if we are giving them a message that their churches won’t back up.

    Bruce

    1. Hello Bruce,
      I think the main reason is a misunderstanding of the divorce discussion in Matthew 5 and 19. I believe that people sincerely believe these passages allow for divorce, and by extension, remarriage when adultery has taken place. A secondary reason is that it is simply a difficult teaching for people to embrace. It would require telling divorced people, even young ones, that they must remain single as long as their spouse is alive. That is a very hard thing to share with people who want to marry.

  3. Hi Scott,
    Does salvation after divorce have any effect on remarriage? Scriptures as in Ephesians 4:22-24, Romans 6:6 and John 3:3 declare a person is a new creature in Christ and a new being in God’s eyes. Can God see us as new creatures in Christ and a blank slate simultaneously with bondage to old covenants? Would this mean I am not a blank slate after all and some part of my old sinful self is still alive despite my salvation?

    I ask this because I was married briefly as a teenager and we had an unbiblical divorce. I met a good (never married) man years later and we had 2 children. Eventually we got saved and began living for Christ, raising our children in Christ, and felt it was in His will to marry. We are 3 weeks away from our wedding date now and 7 years as a couple, 5 years as parents. 3 years saved.

    My pastor holds your views on marriage yet encourages our marriage because of 1 Corinthians 7:20-24. Since we were saved and born again as parents and leaders of our family, we are told to marry and continue raising our children in Christ.

    However, Matthew 19 strikes me with terror that our marriage will rather be viewed by God as a continuous act of adultery and ultimately be our damnation. If, however, I am a new creature in Christ with a new soul and heart through His blood, then am I not seen as free of old covenants made in my old life as well and free to marry as this new creature? Or am I the damnation of us both? I am under such distress over this I can barely function.

    Thank you!

    1. Hello Emily,
      I’m sorry that it took me so long to respond. Your comment is very important, so I copied it below so I could respond to each part of it…

      Hi Scott,
      Does salvation after divorce have any effect on remarriage? Scriptures in Ephesians 4:22-24, Romans 6:6 and John 3:3 declare a person is a new creature in Christ and a new being in God’s eyes. Can God see us as new creatures in Christ and a blank slate simultaneously with bondage to old covenants? Would this mean I am not a blank slate after all and some part of my old sinful self is still alive despite my salvation?

      No, salvation after divorce does not have any effect on marriage or remarriage in terms of nullifying the relationship. In other words, if two unbelievers are married and one of them becomes a believer neither one of them is given the biblical allowance to divorce. Similarly, if people are divorced unbelievers and they become believers, they do not have any more allowance to remarry as a believer than they had as an unbeliever. To make it simple, as I said in the sermon and wrote in the post, the Bible identifies the death of a spouse as the only acceptable time to remarry. This applies to believers and unbelievers alike.

      If salvation nullified marriages, then any time two unbelievers were married and one of them became a believer, the believer would be able to divorce his or her spouse.

      I ask this because I was married briefly as a teenager and we had an unbiblical divorce. I met a good (never married) man years later and we had 2 children. Eventually we got saved and began living for Christ, raising our children in Christ, and felt it was in His will to marry. We are 3 weeks away from our wedding date now and 7 years as a couple, 5 years as parents. 3 years saved.

      I am sorry about your divorce. I just want to say that if not for God’s grace, I’m sure I could have been married and divorced as well. I do not look down on anyone in your situation.

      As I also wrote in the post, if people remarried with living spouses I believe, for the reasons I listed and preached, that they should remain married to that person. I made the very best argument that I could. I do not believe the people are in perpetual adultery, although I do know some people hold that position.

      My pastor holds your views on marriage yet encourages our marriage because of 1 Corinthians 7:20-24. Since we were saved and born again as parents and leaders of our family, we are told to marry and continue raising our children in Christ.

      However, Matthew 19 strikes me with terror that our marriage will rather be viewed by God as a continuous act of adultery and ultimately be our damnation. If, however, I am a new creature in Christ with a new soul and heart through His blood, then am I not seen as free of old covenants made in my old life as well and free to marry as this new creature? Or am I the damnation of us both? I am under such distress over this I can barely function.

      I do understand what you are saying about Matthew 19 (and Matthew 5) and I have to say that I greatly admire your sensitivity to Scripture. I wish more people were as concerned about disobeying the Bible as you seem to be.

      With that said, I am not absolutely convinced of my position. I would not steak my salvation on it like I would certain other doctrines, such as the deity of Christ or inspiration of Scripture. All I can do is present what I believe is the strongest biblical case, which I tried to do. I do apologize for not being able to be more certain with you or others.

      Thank you!

      You are welcome and God bless!

  4. Is there more scriptural evidence to support a second marriage as being valid in Gods eyes? I am struggling with my situation having learned a new view of marriage and divorce that is aligned with almost everything you taught here. However, with Paul speaking about death being the only thing that breaks a marriage bond, how is a second marriage valid in God’s eyes? Also, how can we look to Deuteronomy as an example of a second marriage being acceptable when we agree Jesus raised the standard? I agree Jesus references a husband beyond the first in those passages, but that doesn’t imply they are valid marriages, does it? One man, one woman, implies one marriage for life. I see arguments on the other side when Jesus says, “Let no man put asunder” which seems to imply you can break this marriage bond, but that doesn’t necessarily translate to valid divorce. Lastly, much has been said around the tense of “committeth adultery” it is for sure adultery but is it a one-time sin or ongoing? Thank you in advance.

    1. Is there more scriptural evidence to support a second marriage as being valid in Gods eyes? I am struggling with my situation having learned a new view of marriage and divorce that is aligned with almost everything you taught here. However, with Paul speaking about death being the only thing that breaks a marriage bond, how is a second marriage valid in God’s eyes? Also, how can we look to Deuteronomy as an example of a second marriage being acceptable when we agree Jesus raised the standard? I agree Jesus references a husband beyond the first in those passages, but that doesn’t imply they are valid marriages, does it? One man, one woman, implies one marriage for life. I see arguments on the other side when Jesus says, “Let no man put asunder” which seems to imply you can break this marriage bond, but that doesn’t necessarily translate to valid divorce. Lastly, much has been said around the tense of “committeth adultery” it is for sure adultery but is it a one time sin or ongoing? Thank you in advance.Hello Dan,
      I understand your struggle. I experience the same tension you do. I read your questions, and they are the same questions I have.

      I did my best in the post to explain why I believe a second marriage is acceptable. I don’t have any more defense than what is written in the post.

      I definitely am not as convinced about my position on this as I am about other doctrines I hold. I know there are others who disagree with me and believe that remarriage with a living spouse is perpetual adultery. It sounds like that is your concern?

      I do wish that I had a better response for you, but everything I could come up with I put in the post. Additionally, I have wrestled with this for years, so it isn’t so much a sermon I prepared over a week, but a sermon that has been years in the making.

  5. Hello Pastor LaPierre,
    Please help me by praying for the reconciliation of my marriage. I have been divorced (according to man, but still married according to God’s law) 9 years now. Along the way I gave up and picked it back up. It was April of 2020 that God spoke to me in His word that if I married another man while my husband is still alive, I would be committing adultery. I have had many people tell me to move on with my life, but I know and confirm what God spoke to me. At times I lose hope, and at times I think who am I kidding, or did I really hear from God. My husband is showing no signs of wanting to reconcile. But I have to just keep believing and praying that God will not go against His word in this matter or for any matter.

    1. Evelyn,
      I wish I received more comments like this with prayer requests for marriages to be restored. Instead, I typically receive the opposite: people writing to justify their divorce. I will pray that your marriage is put back together. We have the same view of divorce and remarriage and I’m glad that God a burden to you for your husband. Even if your husband doesn’t reconcile with you, you can still be faithful to him. I doubt many things are as pleasing to the Lord as remaining faithful to an unfaithful spouse. Please keep me updated.

  6. Good job contorting the scriptures. The duplicitous use conflicting definitions of “bound,” taking them out of context and being a paulinian — whilst completely ignoring the words of Christ. Vows are absolutely conditional. But we are warned the days of apostasy and false teaching would increase.

    1. Hello H,
      You disagree with my understanding of the word bound. So you believe that Paul just said in verses 10 and 11 that if the unbelieving spouse departs, the believing spouse should remain unmarried or reconcile, then say the opposite in verse 15? That doesn’t make sense. God isn’t going to say, “If your spouse departs you should remain unmarried or be reconciled” and then say, “If your spouse departs you are no longer bound to that person and can remarry.”

      If bowels were conditional they would contain the word if. We would take our vows and say, “I take you as my husband until death do us part IF…” The absence of the word if in our vows reveals their unconditional nature.

  7. To Scott: I can answer the question you posed to A.

    There is so much confusion on the subject of divorce and remarriage, and I believe much of it is unnecessary. When we look to the Word of God for principles instead of a legal code, it becomes much clearer:

    A valid ground for divorce is any material breach of the marital covenant. Adultery and abandonment are named as such breaches, but just because a breach isn’t explicitly named in Scripture (abuse, drug use, gross financial irresponsibility, attempted murder, etc) does not make it any less valid as a ground for divorce. You do NOT have to tolerate abuse, neglect, etc. Anyone who claims otherwise is preaching false doctrine.

    Also, Jesus did NOT condemn remarriage after divorce per se. One man dumps a faithful wife just to run off with some other girlie. Another man finally decides he’s put up with enough lies, drug use, etc from his wife and divorces her – then marries a better woman five years later. It is the actions of the first man, not the second man, that Jesus rightly condemned as tantamount to adultery. In other words, it was the abuse of the divorce process for selfish or trivial reasons that Jesus had a problem with, not divorce and remarriage per se. If it was morally legit to dump your spouse for “any cause” or no cause at all, then marriage as we know it might as well not even exist.

    Jesus also said at Matthew 5:17-18 and Luke 16:17 that Heaven and Earth would disappear before a single letter of the Law of the Prophets were to disappear. Deuteronomy 24:1-4 makes it very clear that someone who is divorced is free to remarry. So does 1 Corinthians 7:9, 15, and 28 – those verses apply to those who are unmarried for any reason, regardless of any prior marital status.

    So if Jesus did away with divorce – as is sometimes claimed – then when did Heaven and Earth disappear? I wonder why I was not informed.

    God is not unjust. He does not impose unreasonable and unjust constraints on people simply because they had no reasonable choice but to terminate a marriage to someone who continued to violate the terms of the marital covenant in egregious ways.

    Marital vows are not a suicide pact. To insist that one is bound to the marriage regardless of how their spouse behaves is idolatry. And to hold that God cares more about keeping the marriage intact than He does about those in the marriage is blasphemous and slanderous to God.

    1. Daniel,
      I am wondering if you read my post or listened to the sermon? I ask because so many of your comments contradicted what I taught and I believe what Scripture says.

      I copied your comment below so I could respond to each part of it

      To Scott: I can answer the question you posed to A.

      There is so much confusion on the subject of divorce and remarriage, and I believe much of it is unnecessary. When we look to the Word of God for principles instead of a legal code, it becomes much clearer:

      A valid ground for divorce is any material breach of the marital covenant. Adultery and abandonment are named as such breaches, but just because a breach isn’t explicitly named in Scripture (abuse, drug use, gross financial irresponsibility, attempted murder, etc) does not make it any less valid as a ground for divorce.

      In the post and sermon I explained that Jesus permitted divorce during a betrothal when adultery was committed, but not when two people were buried. And in 1 Corinthians 7 I explained that abandonment is permission to be separated, but not divorce. Paul himself said in the passage that the couple should remain separated or reconcile, but not divorce.

      You do NOT have to tolerate abuse, neglect, etc. Anyone who claims otherwise is preaching false doctrine.

      We do agree that people do not have to tolerate abuse, which I explained in the post and sermon. They can separate, but as I explained in the post and sermon this does not mean they can divorce.

      As far as not tolerating neglect. Probably every spouse would say they experience neglect at times, because who can say that their spouse gives them all the attention they want all the time? But you are saying people don’t have to tolerate that? Do you mean they can divorce their spouse when they are not treated like they deserve? It would seem, according to you, that people can divorce for almost any reason. Then you added that to say otherwise is a false doctrine.

      Also, Jesus did NOT condemn remarriage after divorce per se.

      Jesus strongly condemned remarriage after divorce in these verses:
      —Luke 16:18 “Everyone who divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery, and he who marries a woman divorced from her husband commits adultery.
      —Mark 10:11 And he said to them, “Whoever divorces his wife and marries another commits adultery against her, 12 and if she divorces her husband and marries another, she commits adultery.”

      One man dumps a faithful wife just to run off with some other girlie. Another man finally decides he’s put up with enough lies, drug use, etc from his wife and divorces her – then marries a better woman five years later. It is the actions of the first man, not the second man, that Jesus rightly condemned as tantamount to adultery.In other words, it was the abuse of the divorce process for selfish or trivial reasons that Jesus had a problem with, not divorce and remarriage per se.

      Again, please read the verses I just mentioned above. They don’t remotely support your statement.

      If it was morally legit to dump your spouse for “any cause” or no cause at all, then marriage as we know it might as well not even exist.

      We agree on this.

      Jesus also said at Matthew 5:17-18 and Luke 16:17 that Heaven and Earth would disappear before a single letter of the Law of the Prophets were to disappear. Deuteronomy 24:1-4 makes it very clear that someone who is divorced is free to remarry.

      In the sermon on the Mount Jesus taught that He was raising the standard. Repeatedly He said, “You have heard…but I say.” The Mosaic law is not the standard for us. The law of Christ is.

      So does 1 Corinthians 7:9, 15, and 28 – those verses apply to those who are unmarried for any reason, regardless of any prior marital status.

      I’m not sure your point in mentioning these verses. Verse nine encourages people to marry. Verse fifteen tells believers they can let their unbelieving spouse separate, but it does not permit divorce. Verse twenty-eight tells people they can marry without sinning despite Paul’s discouragement from marrying, because of the current persecution they were experiencing.

      So if Jesus did away with divorce – as is sometimes claimed – then when did Heaven and Earth disappear? I wonder why I was not informed.

      The irony of this statement is I dealt with Deuteronomy 24 in the sermon and post. Again, I’m wondering if you read or listened?

      God is not unjust.

      We agree on this as well and it is another ironic statement from you, because God’s justice is what leads him to punish sin.

      He does not impose unreasonable and unjust constraints on people simply because they had no reasonable choice but to terminate a marriage to someone who continued to violate the terms of the marital covenant in egregious ways.

      No reasonable choice? You are saying people must divorce? There is nothing to support this in Scripture. Again, people can’t separate under certain conditions, and elders (again as I wrote and preached) should support the separated wife and perhaps children, but this is not permission to divorce.

      Marital vows are not a suicide pact. To insist that one is bound to the marriage regardless of how their spouse behaves is idolatry.

      Actually, Scripture completely argues against what you just wrote. A vow is in fact INDEPENDENT of the spouse. In other words, when people make a vow, with marriage being the most binding, they are expected to maintain their vow regardless of what their spouse does or doesn’t do. I also discussed this in the post and sermon.

      And to hold that God cares more about keeping the marriage intact than He does about those in the marriage is blasphemous and slanderous to God.

      Marriage is a picture of God’s relationship to Israel in the Old Testament in Christ’s relationship to the church in the New Testament. Few things could be more important to Him. I feel like you are using words that you don’t understand. Even if you are correct and I am incorrect then I would be teaching something falsely, but it wouldn’t be blasphemous or slanderous.

  8. I regret ever writing to you. Would you recommend staying married to someone like a psychopath or sociopath? Who commits crimes against spouse? Perhaps leading to great harm to their lives? Yes you would.

    1. Hello A,
      Would I “recommend staying married to someone like a psychopath or sociopath? Who commits crimes against spouse? Perhaps leading to great harm to their lives? Yes you would.”

      Yes, you are correct, I would recommend staying married (or more importantly Scripture would), but separation can be warranted. I wrote in the post about the possible need to separate.

      Can you let me know what I’ve said that is unbiblical?

      1. Sickness– Scott thinks God will have a woman stay “faithful” to Ted Bundy or Jeffery Dalmer because God expects YOU to be faithful in marriage to a son of Satan, and even if Ted or Jeff leave and divorce YOU… You are still BOUND to stay faithful to your vow…even though Ted/Jeff has made it clear he doesn’t want to be married to you– which any sane person would recognize this is God’s protection and rescue of his daughter and you are FREE. Nope Scott says you are not…Eww.

        1. Hello again H,
          I discussed separation. Just because people shouldn’t divorce (and should remain faithful to their vows) it doesn’t mean they must continue living with – as you said – a Ted Bundy or Jeffrey Dahmer.

    2. Hi A. With all due respect, why would you be mad at him? Did he make you marry this individual? It was ultimately YOUR DECISION to make. With that being said, God can change ANYONE. NO PERSON is beyond His reach. He changed the Apostle Paul who would go on to be one of the greatest disciples. I am certain that you were not born saved. I am certain that the Lord had to and is doing some things in YOUR LIFE. So, since you’re not beyond His reach, what makes you think your spouse is? We are so quick to label people. What kind of label was on your life before Christ reached in and saved you (providing that you belong to Him)? God has the power to change ANYBODY and this includes the sociopath or psychopath spouse of yours. If you choose to divorce this person and marry another you will commit adultery. What is in this world is worth YOUR SOUL?

      1. Evelyn,
        Thank you for responding to A. I agree with you that so often people are mad at the wrong person. Typically they get mad at God. But like you said, we are not forced to marry anyone. Nobody made us take our vows. God can change her husband, but even if He doesn’t, she can still remain faithful to the valves she made. They were made to her husband, but more importantly they were made to God Himself, and He expects her to keep them.

Do you have a question or thought? If so, please let me know. I do my best to respond to each comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe to Scott's Podcast
Subscribe to Scott's Newsletter

… and receive a free ebook. 
You can unsubscribe anytime.

Newsletter subscription for Scott LaPierre with Seven Biblical Insights