Christ Is Whose Son? David’s Son and Lord

Christ is David’s Son according to His humanity and David’s Lord because He is God. In Matthew 22:41–46 and Luke 20:41–44, Jesus asks how the Messiah can be David’s descendant when David calls Him Lord in Psalm 110. The answer reveals who Jesus is: the promised King from David’s family and the divine Lord whom David himself worshiped.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Follow the podcast: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | RSS

Why Was the Messiah Called the Son of David?

The religious leaders had been questioning Jesus. Then He asked the Pharisees a question of His own: whose son is the Christ? They answered that He is the son of David. That answer reflected God’s promise of a lasting kingdom through David’s family in 2 Samuel 7.

The title was not limited to conversations among religious teachers. The blind man in Luke 18 appealed to Jesus as the Son of David. Mark 10 identifies him as Bartimaeus. A Canaanite woman likewise addressed Jesus as the Son of David when she sought help for her daughter in Matthew 15:22. They were appealing to the promised Messiah.

Calling the Messiah David’s Son was correct. Jesus’ next question showed that it was not a complete explanation of His identity. To understand the promise behind the title, see why Jesus is called the Son of David.

How Can Jesus Be David’s Son and Lord?

Jesus directed His hearers to Psalm 110:1, where David describes the Lord addressing someone David calls his Lord. God invites this person to sit at His right hand until His enemies are placed under His feet. Jesus asks how David can call the Messiah Lord if the Messiah is also his son.

The question draws attention to the Messiah’s greatness. David was Israel’s king, yet he acknowledged the authority of this coming King. The promised descendant would be greater than His royal ancestor. He would occupy the place of honor and authority at God’s right hand.

There are two persons in the conversation David records: God, who speaks, and David’s Lord, whom God addresses. In the New Testament’s application, the Father addresses the Son. The passage does not identify the Father and the Son as the same person. It reveals the exalted position of the Messiah.

Jesus was not denying that He descended from David. He was challenging a view of the Messiah that stopped at human ancestry. Matthew 22:46 records that His hearers could not answer Him.

Davidic Descent Does Not Explain Everything About the Messiah

The Pharisees’ answer in this conversation tells us what they affirmed: the Messiah would come from David. Jesus pressed them to account for the rest of Scripture’s testimony. A great human king alone would not explain the full identity of the One presented throughout the New Testament.

We should let this particular exchange speak for itself rather than assume every Jewish person held an identical set of expectations. Nor does the Pharisees’ answer mean they had accepted Jesus as the Messiah. They were answering a question about the Christ’s ancestry. Jesus used their answer to direct them toward the deeper question of who He is.

Jesus Is Fully God as Well as Fully Human

The Christian answer holds together truths that we must not separate. Jesus is truly David’s descendant according to the flesh. He is also the eternal Son of God. John 1:1–3 presents the Word as divine and as the One through whom all things were made; John 1:14 declares that the Word became flesh.

As man, Jesus belongs to David’s family. As Creator, He is the source of David’s existence. He did not begin to exist when He was born, and He did not become divine when He rose from the dead. The incarnation is the eternal Son taking on a true human nature.

Psalm 110 is part of this larger biblical testimony. The title “Lord” should not be treated as though the word by itself settles every question about Christ’s deity. Jesus’ question, His other claims, and the apostles’ teaching together reveal the identity of David’s greater Son. He is the God-man, fully God and fully man.

A Conversation About Whether Jesus Is God

When I was an elementary school teacher, an aide in my classroom was a Jehovah’s Witness. She was kind, we enjoyed working together, and she reinforced many of the character lessons I taught. We also had pleasant conversations about our theological differences. Sometimes she brought a copy of The Watchtower to explain an answer.

One day her husband and another Jehovah’s Witness came to my home. Our conversation quickly turned to who Jesus is. He opened his New World Translation and pointed to a passage identifying Jesus as the Son of God. I asked whether he believed Jesus was God. His answer made clear that, for him, calling Jesus God’s Son excluded the Christian confession of His full deity.

Jehovah’s Witnesses affirm that Jesus is God’s Son while denying that He is Almighty God. The disagreement is therefore not resolved simply by using the same title. We must ask what Scripture says about the Son’s nature and relationship to the Father.

John 5:17–18 connects Jesus’ claim about His Father’s work with equality with God. In John 10:30–33, His opponents understand His claim of unity with the Father as making Himself God. In Luke 5:20–24, Jesus forgives a man’s sins and demonstrates His authority by healing him. These passages require more than the conclusion that Jesus was merely an unusually good man.

John 8:58 gives another striking testimony: Jesus speaks of His existence before Abraham using the words “I am.” Pastor Nathan once gave me a sweatshirt identifying me as part of the grammar police, which fits my habit of correcting grammar. But Jesus’ wording here is not a mistake to correct. It is a declaration to consider carefully.

In light of the divine name in Exodus 3:14 and John’s wider presentation of Jesus, I understand this as a claim to His eternal, divine identity. His hearers responded by picking up stones. The question of who Jesus is could hardly be more serious.

The Root and Offspring of David

Revelation 22:16 brings two images together when Jesus identifies Himself as David’s root and offspring. The language invites us to consider how the promised descendant also stands above the family from which He came.

Isaiah 11:1 pictures a shoot coming from the stump of Jesse, David’s father. The Hebrew word translated “shoot” contributes to the picture of new growth from a cut-down royal family. God’s promise would bear fruit even when David’s line appeared reduced to a stump. Isaiah 11:10 also speaks of the root of Jesse, to whom the nations would turn.

We should not make every use of the root image carry precisely the same meaning or ask one metaphor to prove the whole doctrine of Christ. Read alongside the New Testament’s teaching about Jesus as Creator, Revelation’s language fits the wonderful truth that He both entered David’s family and existed before it. This is one of the biblical paradoxes that becomes clearer when we recognize His humanity and deity.

How Psalm 110 Connects to Jesus’ Resurrection

Earlier in Luke 20, the Sadducees had challenged the resurrection with a question about a woman who successively married seven brothers. Their example drew on levirate marriage. Jesus answered their mistaken assumptions about marriage in the resurrection and affirmed that the dead will be raised.

His subsequent question about David’s Lord turns our attention to the Messiah’s place at God’s right hand. The word “Lord” alone is not a complete argument for the resurrection. Acts 2:29–36 makes the connection explicit: Peter proclaims that God raised Jesus, exalted Him, and fulfilled the words of Psalm 110 in Him.

David died and was buried. Jesus died, rose, and ascended to the Father’s right hand. His resurrection and exaltation vindicate Him as the promised King. They do not transform a merely human descendant into God; they reveal the triumph of the One who was already the eternal Son.

Knowing the Truth Brings Accountability

Luke follows this exchange with Jesus’ warning about the scribes in Luke 20:45–47. They delighted in public recognition, prominent seats, and places of honor. Their outward religious appearance concealed exploitation and pride.

Jesus specifically condemned their treatment of widows and their use of long prayers as a pretense. The passage does not explain every method by which they exploited these women, but the charge is clear. Religious influence was being used to harm people who needed care. Jesus warned that such conduct would bring greater condemnation.

The warning reaches beyond that setting. Knowing biblical language, holding a respected position, or appearing devout does not excuse refusing God’s truth. Knowledge increases our responsibility to respond humbly and to treat people rightly.

How Will We Respond to David’s Son and Lord?

Jesus’ question is more than a puzzle about a family tree. It confronts us with His identity and authority. We cannot rightly honor Him while reducing Him to whatever kind of teacher or leader we would prefer Him to be.

The promised Son of David is the risen Lord. He sits at the Father’s right hand and will return to judge the living and the dead. Repent of your sins and place your faith in Him. Those who belong to Christ can look forward to resurrection life with the Savior who is both truly human and truly God.

Questions for Reflection

• Why is “the Son of David” a true but incomplete answer to the question of Christ’s identity?
• How do Jesus’ resurrection and exaltation reveal His victory without implying that He only then became divine?
• How should knowing who Jesus is change the way you exercise influence and treat vulnerable people?

Watch the Sermon